SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D 1H-15N NOESY0.3 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] msrA, 5 mM DTT, 50 mM TRIS, 5 mM EDTA90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient300
22D 1H-15N HSQC0.3 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] msrA, 5 mM DTT, 50 mM TRIS, 5 mM EDTA90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient300
32D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic0.3 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] msrA, 5 mM DTT, 50 mM TRIS, 5 mM EDTA90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient300
43D CBCA(CO)NH0.3 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] msrA, 5 mM DTT, 50 mM TRIS, 5 mM EDTA90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient300
53D HNCACB0.3 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] msrA, 5 mM DTT, 50 mM TRIS, 5 mM EDTA90% H2O/10% D2O7.0ambient300
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAvance800
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingThe authors state that the distortion around Cys206 CA in model 1 is a manifestation of the averaging, reflecting that local flexibility often cannot be accurately represented as a single structure.X-PLOR_NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria
Conformers Calculated Total Number200
Conformers Submitted Total Number21
Representative Model1 (minimized average structure)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementX-PLOR_NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2structure solutionX-PLOR_NIHSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore