SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_15N-separated_NOESY0.7 mM [U-95% 13C; U-90% 15N] Nanog, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O2507.0AMBIENT298
23D_13C-separated_NOESY0.7 mM [U-95% 13C; U-90% 15N] Nanog, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O2507.0AMBIENT298
33D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)0.7 mM [U-95% 13C; U-90% 15N] Nanog, 95% H2O, 5% D2O95% H2O/5% D2O2507.0AMBIENT298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENTAUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT. STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1766 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 597 INTRA, 423 SEQUENTIAL, 224 MEDIUM and 522 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 197 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsALL TRIPLE-RESONANCE AND NOESY SPECTRA WERE ACQUIRED USING A CRYOGENIC PROBE
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNS1.21Brunger A. T. et.al.