2KK1
Solution structure of C-terminal Domain of Tyrosine-protein kinase ABL2 from Homo sapiens, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) target HR5537A
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
2 | 2D 1H-13C HSQC | 1.2 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
3 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
4 | 3D HNCO | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
5 | 3D HNCACB | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
6 | 3D 1H-13C NOESY | 1.2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein | 100% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
7 | 3D HBHA(CO)NH | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
8 | 3D C(CO)NH | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
9 | 3D HCCH-TOCSY | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 | |
10 | 3D 1H-13C-15N simutaneous NOESY | 1.2 mM [U-100% 15N] protein | 95% H2O/5% D2O | 0.2 | 4.5 | ambient | 298 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Bruker | AVANCE | 800 |
2 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
molecular dynamics, simulated annealing, distance geometry | CNS |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | target function |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (fewest violations) |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | CNS | 1.2 | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read |
2 | refinement | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
3 | geometry optimization | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
4 | structure solution | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
5 | refinement | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
6 | data analysis | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
7 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
8 | data analysis | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
9 | chemical shift assignment | XEASY | 1.3 | Bartels et al. |
10 | data analysis | XEASY | 1.3 | Bartels et al. |
11 | peak picking | XEASY | 1.3 | Bartels et al. |
12 | processing | NMRPipe | 1.3 | Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax |
13 | collection | VnmrJ | 1.3 | Varian |
14 | collection | TopSpin | 1.3 | Bruker Biospin |