SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_13C-separated_NOESYG311 mutant protein0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl.0.1M7.0ambient275
23D_15N-separated_NOESYG311 mutant protein0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl.0.1M7.0ambient275
33D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3DCBCACONH, 3D HBHA(CBCACO)NH, 3D (H)C(CO)NH-TOCSY, H(CCO)NH-TOCSY, 2D TOCSY, 2D-CBHD, 2DCBHE, 2D TOCSYG311 mutant protein0.1 M KPi, pH7.0, ~0.6 M GuHCl.0.1M7.0ambient275
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerDRX600
2BrukerDRX500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
CNS 1.1simulated annealingXwinNMR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection CriteriaThe submitted conformer models are those with the fewest number of constraint violations.
Conformers Calculated Total Number50
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionXwinNMR2.5Bruker Co.
2processingNMRPipeFrank Delaglio Stephan Grzeiek, Guang Zhu, Geerten W. Vuister, John Pfeifer, and Ad Bax
3data analysisSparky3T. D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller
4structure solutionCNS1.1A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren
5refinementCNS1.1A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren