1R9K

Representative solution structure of the catalytic domain of SopE2


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D NOESY1mM SopE2 unlabelled; 20mM tris buffer; 99.6% D2O99.6% D2O07ambient298
22D TOCSY1mM SopE2 unlabelled; 20mM tris buffer; 99.6% D2O99.6% D2O07ambient298
33D_13C-separated_NOESY1mM SopE2 U-15N,13C; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O07ambient298
43D_15N-separated_NOESY1mM SopE2 U-15N,13C; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O07ambient298
5HNHA1mM SopE2 U-15N; 20mM HEPES buffer; 90% H2O, 10% D2O90% H2O/10% D2O07ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealinghe structures are based on a total of 3065 restraints, 2682 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 249 dihedral angle restraints,134 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds.NMRPipe
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number1
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsThe structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1processingNMRPipe2.1Delaglio et al
2data analysisSparky3.1Goddard & kneller
3structure solutionXPLOR-NIH2.06Schwieters et al
4refinementXPLOR-NIH2.06Schwieters et al