2XWL

Crystal structure of IspD from Mycobacterium smegmatis in complex with CTP and Mg


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.49 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.210 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.186 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structural and Functional Studies on Mycobacterial Ispd Enzymes

Bjorkelid, C.Bergfors, T.Henriksson, L.M.Stern, A.L.Unge, T.Mowbray, S.L.Jones, T.A.

(2011) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67: 403

  • DOI: 10.1107/S0907444911006160
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2XWL, 2XWM, 2XWN

  • PubMed Abstract: 
  • A number of pathogens, including the causative agents of tuberculosis and malaria, synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate via the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway rather than the classical mevalonate pathway found in humans. As part of a structure-based drug-discovery program against tuberculosis, IspD, the enzyme that carries out the third step in the MEP pathway, was targeted ...

    A number of pathogens, including the causative agents of tuberculosis and malaria, synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate via the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway rather than the classical mevalonate pathway found in humans. As part of a structure-based drug-discovery program against tuberculosis, IspD, the enzyme that carries out the third step in the MEP pathway, was targeted. Constructs of both the Mycobacterium smegmatis and the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enzymes that were suitable for structural and inhibitor-screening studies were engineered. Two crystal structures of the M. smegmatis enzyme were produced, one in complex with CTP and the other in complex with CMP. In addition, the M. tuberculosis enzyme was crystallized in complex with CTP. Here, the structure determination and crystallographic refinement of these crystal forms and the enzymatic characterization of the M. tuberculosis enzyme construct are reported. A comparison with known IspD structures allowed the definition of the structurally conserved core of the enzyme. It indicates potential flexibility in the enzyme and in particular in areas close to the active site. These well behaved constructs provide tools for future target-based screening of potential inhibitors. The conserved nature of the extended active site suggests that any new inhibitor will potentially exhibit broad-spectrum activity.


    Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden.



Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChainsSequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
2-C-METHYL-D-ERYTHRITOL 4-PHOSPHATE CYTIDYLYLTRANSFERASEA, B223Mycolicibacterium smegmatisMutation(s): 0 
EC: 2.7.7.60
UniProt
Find proteins for A0R560 (Mycolicibacterium smegmatis (strain ATCC 700084 / mc(2)155))
Explore A0R560 
Go to UniProtKB:  A0R560
Protein Feature View
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChainsName / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
CTP
Query on CTP

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
D [auth A], F [auth B]CYTIDINE-5'-TRIPHOSPHATE
C9 H16 N3 O14 P3
PCDQPRRSZKQHHS-XVFCMESISA-N
 Ligand Interaction
MG
Query on MG

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A], E [auth B]MAGNESIUM ION
Mg
JLVVSXFLKOJNIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N
 Ligand Interaction
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.49 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.210 
  • R-Value Work: 0.185 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.186 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.33α = 90
b = 72.98β = 90
c = 117.18γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
MOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-04-27
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2012-02-01
    Changes: Database references, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2019-03-06
    Changes: Data collection, Experimental preparation, Other
  • Version 1.3: 2019-05-15
    Changes: Data collection, Experimental preparation