2GVM

Crystal structure of hydrophobin HFBI with detergent


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.247 
  • R-Value Work: 0.233 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.233 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Two crystal structures of Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin HFBI--The structure of a protein amphiphile with and without detergent interaction.

Hakanpaa, J.M.Szilvay, G.R.Kaljunen, H.Maksimainen, M.Linder, M.Rouvinen, J.

(2006) Protein Sci 15: 2129-2140

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.062326706
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2FZ6, 2GVM

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Hydrophobins are small fungal proteins that are highly surface active and possess a unique ability to form amphiphilic membranes through spontaneous self-assembly. The first crystal structure of a hydrophobin, Trichoderma reesei HFBII, revealed the structural basis for the function of this amphiphilic protein--a patch consisting of hydrophobic side chains on the protein surface. Here, the crystal structures of a native and a variant T. reesei hydrophobin HFBI are presented, revealing the same overall structure and functional hydrophobic patch as in the HFBII structure. However, some structural flexibility was found in the native HFBI structure: The asymmetric unit contained four molecules, and, in two of these, an area of seven residues was displaced as compared to the two other HFBI molecules and the previously determined HFBII structure. This structural change is most probably induced by multimer formation. Both the native and the N-Cys-variant of HFBI were crystallized in the presence of detergents, but an association between the protein and a detergent was only detected in the variant structure. There, the molecules were arranged into an extraordinary detergent-associated octamer and the solvent content of the crystals was 75%. This study highlights the conservation of the fold of class II hydrophobins in spite of the low sequence identity and supports our previous suggestion that concealment of the hydrophobic surface areas of the protein is the driving force in the formation of multimers and monolayers in the self-assembly process.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Chemistry, University of Joensuu, Finland.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Hydrophobin-1
A, B, C, D
75Trichoderma reeseiMutation(s): 0 
Membrane Entity: Yes 
UniProt
Find proteins for P52754 (Hypocrea jecorina)
Explore P52754 
Go to UniProtKB:  P52754
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP52754
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
LDA
Query on LDA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
F [auth A]
G [auth A]
I [auth B]
J [auth B]
K [auth B]
F [auth A],
G [auth A],
I [auth B],
J [auth B],
K [auth B],
L [auth B],
M [auth B],
N [auth B],
O [auth C],
P [auth C]
LAURYL DIMETHYLAMINE-N-OXIDE
C14 H31 N O
SYELZBGXAIXKHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N
ZN
Query on ZN

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
E [auth A],
H [auth B]
ZINC ION
Zn
PTFCDOFLOPIGGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.247 
  • R-Value Work: 0.233 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.233 
  • Space Group: C 2 2 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 91.9α = 90
b = 121.6β = 90
c = 121.2γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
CNSrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
XDSdata reduction
XDSdata scaling
CNSphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2006-08-15
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-05-01
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Derived calculations, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2023-08-30
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description