4QGA

S.aureus TMK in complex with potent inhibitor compound 19, 2-(3-CHLOROPHENOXY)-3-FLUORO-4-{[(3S)-3-(5-METHYL-2,4-DIOXO-3,4-DIHYDROPYRIMIDIN-1(2H)-YL)PIPERIDIN-1-YL]METHYL}BENZOIC ACID

X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Crystallization

Crystalization Experiments
ID	Method	pH	Temperature	Details
1	VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP		293	To obtain the inhibitor bound crystal form of TMK-S.aureus crystals were initially grown in the absence of compound using the sitting drop method at 293 K with a reservoir solution of 100 mM PCPT (propionate-cacodylate-bistris propane buffer) pH 7-8, 21-24% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl using 1:1 protein:reservoir solution with the protein solution at 13 mg/mL. Crystals were harvested and soaked overnight in a solution containing 100 mM PCPT, 35% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl and 1-2 mM or compound from a 100 mM DMSO stock. After soaking the crystals were cryoprotected by soaking for 15 minutes in compound-soak solution supplemented with 20% ethylene glycol., VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP

Crystal Properties
Matthews coefficient	Solvent content
2.08	40.97

Crystal Data

Unit Cell
Length ( Å )	Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.78	α = 90
b = 90.841	β = 102.88
c = 48.221	γ = 90

Symmetry
Space Group	P 1 21 1

Diffraction

Diffraction Experiment
ID #	Crystal ID	Scattering Type	Data Collection Temperature	Detector	Detector Type	Details	Collection Date	Monochromator	Protocol
1	1	x-ray	140	CCD	RIGAKU SATURN 944+	monochrome	2010-04-10		SINGLE WAVELENGTH

Radiation Source
ID #	Source	Type	Wavelength List	Synchrotron Site	Beamline
1	ROTATING ANODE	RIGAKU FR-E+ SUPERBRIGHT	1.54

Data Collection

Overall
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Merge I (Observed)	Net I Over Average Sigma (I)	Redundancy	Number Reflections (All)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Observed Criterion Sigma (F)	Observed Criterion Sigma (I)	B (Isotropic) From Wilson Plot
1	1.94	21.05	94.3	0.072	17.4	2.5	28451	26829			29.7

Highest Resolution Shell
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (All)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Merge I (Observed)	Mean I Over Sigma (Observed)	Redundancy	Number Unique Reflections (All)
1	1.94	2.01	87.7		0.233	4.1	2	2514

Refinement

Statistics
Diffraction ID	Structure Solution Method	Cross Validation method	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Number Reflections (R-Free)	Percent Reflections (Observed)	R-Factor (Observed)	R-Work	R-Free	R-Free Selection Details	Mean Isotropic B
X-RAY DIFFRACTION	MOLECULAR REPLACEMENT	THROUGHOUT	1.94	21.05	26829	1365	94.29	0.1932	0.1919	0.2173	RANDOM	35.96

Temperature Factor Modeling
Anisotropic B[1][1]	Anisotropic B[1][2]	Anisotropic B[1][3]	Anisotropic B[2][2]	Anisotropic B[2][3]	Anisotropic B[3][3]
-5.5719		-13.5013	8.0751		-2.5032

RMS Deviations
Key	Refinement Restraint Deviation
o_angle_deg	1.01
o_bond_d	0.1

Non-Hydrogen Atoms Used in Refinement
Non-Hydrogen Atoms	Number
Protein Atoms	3128
Nucleic Acid Atoms
Solvent Atoms	165
Heterogen Atoms	68

Software

Software
Software Name	Purpose
BUSTER	refinement
AMoRE	phasing
PHENIX	refinement
PDB_EXTRACT	data extraction
JDirector	data collection
PROCESS	data reduction
SCALA	data scaling

RCSB PDB Core Operations are funded by the National Science Foundation (DBI-1832184), the US Department of Energy (DE-SC0019749), and the National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant R01GM133198.