☰ Navigation Tabs
Solution NMR Structure of De novo designed protein, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target OR459
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 2 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 3 3D HNCO 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 4 3D CBCA(CO)NH 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 5 3D HNCACB 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 6 3D HCCH-COSY 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 7 3D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 8 3D HBHA(CO)NH 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 9 3D HCCH-TOCSY 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 10 3D HN(CA)CO 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 11 GFT-4,3d-hcch-COSY 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298 12 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 1.17 mM OR459.005 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Varian INOVA 600 2 Varian INOVA 750
NMR Refinement Method Details Software torsion angle dynamics, molecular dynamics Water bath refinement CNS
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy Conformers Calculated Total Number 100 Conformers Submitted Total Number 20 Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 2 structure solution CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 3 geometry optimization CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read 4 refinement CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich 5 geometry optimization CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich 6 structure solution CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich 7 data analysis AutoStructure 2.1 Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione 8 refinement AutoStructure 2.1 Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione 9 data analysis AutoAssign 2.1 Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione 10 chemical shift assignment AutoAssign 2.1 Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione 11 analysis CARA Rochus Keller 12 data analysis XEASY Bartels et al. 13 peak picking XEASY Bartels et al. 14 chemical shift assignment XEASY Bartels et al. 15 collection TopSpin Bruker Biospin 16 collection VnmrJ Varian 17 geometry optimization TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax 18 structure validation PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione