Experiment: 2MKW

Solution Structure of 6aJl2 and 6aJL2-R24G Amyloidogenics Light Chain Proteins

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D 1H-15N HSQC	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
2	3D HNCACB	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
3	3D 1H-13C NOESY	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
4	3D 1H-15N NOESY	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
5	3D 1H-15N TOCSY	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
6	3D HNCA	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
7	3D HNCO	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15
8	3D HN(CO)CA	1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 75 mM sodium chloride	95% H2O/5% D2O	75	7.4	ambient	298.15

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Varian	Uniform NMR System	700

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing		X-PLOR NIH

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	20
Representative Model	1 (lowest energy)

Additional NMR Experimental Information
Details	The structure was calculated using a combination of the HN-HSQC, HN-NOESY, D2O-HSQC, SEA-HSQC experiments

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	structure solution	X-PLOR NIH		Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2	refinement	X-PLOR NIH		Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3	geometry optimization	TALOS		Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
4	processing	NMRPipe		Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5	chemical shift assignment	CARA		Rochus L.J. Keller