2LM4

Solution NMR Structure of mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase assembly factor 2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium Target YT682A


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
22D 1H-13C CT-HSQC aliphatic1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
33D HNCO1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
43D CBCA(CO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
53D HNCACB1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
63D HBHA(CO)NH1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
73D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
83D HN(CA)CO1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
92D 1H-13C CT-HSQC aromatic1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
103D HCCH-TOCSY1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
113D (H)CCH-COSY aliphatic1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
123D (H)CCH-COSY aromatic1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
131D 15N T11.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
141D 15N T21.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
152D 1H-13C CT-HSQC methyl1.1 mM [5% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
162D J-resolved 1H-15N HSQC1.1 mM [5% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS95% H2O/5% D2O6.5ambient298
172D J-resolved 1H-15N HSQC0.7 mM [5% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS, 4 % C12E5 PEG, 4 % hexanol90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
182D J-resolved 1H-15N HSQC1.1 mM [5% 13C; U-100% 15N] YT682A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.02 % sodium azide, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA750
2VarianINOVA600
3VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingStructure determination was performed by running CYANA and ASDP in parallel using NOE-based constraints and PHI and PSI dihedral angle constraints from TALOS+. Consensus peak assignments were selected and used in iterative refinement with CYANA, with RDC constraints added at later stages. The 20 conformers out of 100 with the lowest target function were further refined by simulated annealing in explicit water bath using the program CNS with PARAM19 force fieldCNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinement, structure solution, geometry optimizationCNS1.2Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2refinement, geometry optimization, structure solutionCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3data analysis, refinementASDP1.0Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
4data analysis, chemical shift assignmentAutoAssign2.3.0Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
5processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6data analysisXEASY1.3.13Bartels et al.
7processingPROSA6.4Guntert
8collectionVnmrJ2.2DVarian
9geometry optimizationTALOS+Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
10data analysis,peak picking,chemical shift assignmentCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
11refinementCNSBrunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read