SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 3D NOESY | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 2 | 4D NOESY | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 3 | 3D TOCSY | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 4 | HNHA | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 5 | HNHB | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 6 | HACAHB | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 7 | HBHACONH | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 8 | CBCACONH | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 9 | CBCANH | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 10 | HCCHCOSY | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 11 | HCCHTOCSY | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| 12 | CC(CO)NH | 0.01 | 5.4 | 1 atm | 298 | |||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Varian | UNITYPLUS | 600 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing | THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM XPLOR 3.1 ( BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANTS (GARRETT EL AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SER. B 104, 99-103) AND A CONFORMATIONAL DATA BASE POTENTIAL ( KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1996) PROTEIN SCI 5, 1067- 1080 AND (1997) J. MAGN. RESON. 125, 171-177). | X-PLOR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | MINIMIZED MEAN STRUCTURE |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 30 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 1 |
| Representative Model | 1 (n/a) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | MEAN STRUCTURE. THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY ON 13C, 15N-LABELED VMIP-II |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | BRUNGER |
| 2 | structure solution | X-PLOR MODIFIED | ||
