SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 2mM peptide | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 3.5 | atmospheric atm | 290 | |
| 2 | 2D TOCSY | 2mM peptide | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 3.5 | atmospheric atm | 290 | |
| 3 | E-COSY | 2mM peptide | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 3.5 | atmospheric atm | 290 | |
| 4 | DQF-COSY | 2mM peptide | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 0 | 3.5 | atmospheric atm | 290 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | DMX | 750 |
| 2 | Bruker | ARX | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, energy minimisation in a CHARM forcefield | 32 medium and 18 long range NOEs were included, 7 dihedral angle restraints were included, 5 H-bond restraints were included | XwinNMR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 50 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 8 (closest to the average) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques. |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | collection | XwinNMR | 2.6 | Bruker |
| 2 | processing | XwinNMR | 2.6 | Bruker |
| 3 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.851 then 3.1f | Brunger |
| 4 | structure solution | X-PLOR | 3.851 then 3.1f | Brunger |
