☰ Navigation Tabs
SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF CYTOCHROME B5 TRIPLE MUTANT (E48A/E56A/D60A)
NMR Experiment Experiment Type Sample Contents Solvent Ionic Strength pH Pressure Temperature (K) Spectrometer 1 2D NOESY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303 2 DQF-COSY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303 3 TOCSY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303 4 2D NOESY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303 5 DQF-COSY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303 6 TOCSY 4mM cytochrome b5 triple mutant(E48A/E56A/D60A) 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 1 atm 303
NMR Spectrometer Information Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength 1 Bruker DMX 600
NMR Refinement Method Details Software distance geometry simulated annealing molecular dynamics the structures are based on a total of 1522 meaningful NOE-derived distance constraints, together with 190 pseudocontact shift constraints. DYANA
NMR Ensemble Information Conformer Selection Criteria Minimized Average Structure Conformers Calculated Total Number 36 Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Additional NMR Experimental Information Details This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software # Classification Version Software Name Author 1 structure solution DYANA 2 processing XwinNMR 3 data analysis AURELIA 4 structure solution pseudyana 5 data analysis XEASY 6 refinement Amber