SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 5.6 MM [ABU3,35]SHK12-28,17-32; 90% H2O, 10% D2O (V/V) | 5.6 mM PEPTIDE | 5.0 | AMBIENT | 293.0 | ||
| 2 | 2D-TOCSY | 5.6 MM [ABU3,35]SHK12-28,17-32; 90% H2O, 10% D2O (V/V) | 5.6 mM PEPTIDE | 5.0 | AMBIENT | 293.0 | ||
| 3 | DQF-COSY | 5.6 MM [ABU3,35]SHK12-28,17-32; 90% H2O, 10% D2O (V/V) | 5.6 mM PEPTIDE | 5.0 | AMBIENT | 293.0 | ||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | DRX | 600 |
| 2 | Bruker | AMX | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| THE STRUCTURES WERE REFINED USING DISTANCE GEOMETRY, SIMULATED ANNEALING AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS | THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON 328 NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS AND 26 DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINTS | XwinNMR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 50 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (closest to the average) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | THIS STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES. |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | collection | XwinNMR | 2.1 | BRUKER |
| 2 | data analysis | XEASY | 1.3.7 | BARTELS |
| 3 | structure solution | DYANA | 1.4 | GUNTERT |
| 4 | refinement | X-PLOR | 1.3 | BRUNGER |
| 5 | refinement | CHARMM | 19 | BROOKS |
