2WMP

Structure of the E. coli chaperone PapD in complex with the pilin domain of the PapGII adhesin


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.289 
  • R-Value Work: 0.227 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.227 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structure of the Papd-Papgii Pilin Complex Reveals an Open and Flexible P5 Pocket.

Ford, B.A.Verger, D.Dodson, K.W.Volkan, E.Kostakioti, M.Elam, J.S.Pinkner, J.S.Waksman, G.Hultgren, S.J.

(2012) J Bacteriol 194: 6390

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06651-11
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2WMP

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    P pili are hairlike polymeric structures that mediate binding of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to the surface of the kidney via the PapG adhesin at their tips. PapG is composed of two domains: a lectin domain at the tip of the pilus followed by a pilin domain that comprises the initial polymerizing subunit of the 1,000-plus-subunit heteropolymeric pilus fiber. Prior to assembly, periplasmic pilin domains bind to a chaperone, PapD. PapD mediates donor strand complementation, in which a beta strand of PapD temporarily completes the pilin domain's fold, preventing premature, nonproductive interactions with other pilin subunits and facilitating subunit folding. Chaperone-subunit complexes are delivered to the outer membrane usher where donor strand exchange (DSE) replaces PapD's donated beta strand with an amino-terminal extension on the next incoming pilin subunit. This occurs via a zip-in-zip-out mechanism that initiates at a relatively accessible hydrophobic space termed the P5 pocket on the terminally incorporated pilus subunit. Here, we solve the structure of PapD in complex with the pilin domain of isoform II of PapG (PapGIIp). Our data revealed that PapGIIp adopts an immunoglobulin fold with a missing seventh strand, complemented in parallel by the G1 PapD strand, typical of pilin subunits. Comparisons with other chaperone-pilin complexes indicated that the interactive surfaces are highly conserved. Interestingly, the PapGIIp P5 pocket was in an open conformation, which, as molecular dynamics simulations revealed, switches between an open and a closed conformation due to the flexibility of the surrounding loops. Our study reveals the structural details of the DSE mechanism.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Washington University Department of Pathology and Immunology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
CHAPERONE PROTEIN PAPD224Escherichia coli UTI89Mutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for Q1R2W9 (Escherichia coli (strain UTI89 / UPEC))
Explore Q1R2W9 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q1R2W9
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ1R2W9
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PAPG PROTEIN123Escherichia coliMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for Q47445 (Escherichia coli)
Explore Q47445 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q47445
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ47445
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.289 
  • R-Value Work: 0.227 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.227 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 66.56α = 90
b = 90.47β = 90
c = 64.49γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
CNSrefinement
MOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
AMoREphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2010-08-25
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2012-10-03
    Changes: Database references, Other, Refinement description, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2012-12-26
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2023-12-13
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Other, Refinement description