2FLD

I-MsoI Re-Designed for Altered DNA Cleavage Specificity


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.271 
  • R-Value Work: 0.229 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.229 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.6 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity.

Ashworth, J.Havranek, J.J.Duarte, C.M.Sussman, D.Monnat, R.J.Stoddard, B.L.Baker, D.

(2006) Nature 441: 656-659

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04818
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2FLD

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The reprogramming of DNA-binding specificity is an important challenge for computational protein design that tests current understanding of protein-DNA recognition, and has considerable practical relevance for biotechnology and medicine. Here we describe the computational redesign of the cleavage specificity of the intron-encoded homing endonuclease I-MsoI using a physically realistic atomic-level forcefield. Using an in silico screen, we identified single base-pair substitutions predicted to disrupt binding by the wild-type enzyme, and then optimized the identities and conformations of clusters of amino acids around each of these unfavourable substitutions using Monte Carlo sampling. A redesigned enzyme that was predicted to display altered target site specificity, while maintaining wild-type binding affinity, was experimentally characterized. The redesigned enzyme binds and cleaves the redesigned recognition site approximately 10,000 times more effectively than does the wild-type enzyme, with a level of target discrimination comparable to the original endonuclease. Determination of the structure of the redesigned nuclease-recognition site complex by X-ray crystallography confirms the accuracy of the computationally predicted interface. These results suggest that computational protein design methods can have an important role in the creation of novel highly specific endonucleases for gene therapy and other applications.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. ashwortj@u.washington.edu


Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 3
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
DNA ENDONUCLEASE I-MSOIC [auth A],
D [auth B]
165Monomastix sp. OKE-1Mutation(s): 2 
UniProt
Find proteins for C0JWR6 (Monomastix sp. (strain OKE-1))
Explore C0JWR6 
Go to UniProtKB:  C0JWR6
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupC0JWR6
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence

Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
5'-D(*GP*CP*AP*GP*AP*AP*GP*GP*TP*CP*GP*TP*GP*AP*GP*AP*CP*CP*GP*TP*TP*CP*CP*G)-3'A [auth C]24N/A
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence

Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
5'-D(*CP*GP*GP*AP*AP*CP*GP*GP*TP*CP*TP*CP*AP*CP*GP*AP*CP*CP*TP*TP*CP*TP*GP*C)-3'B [auth D]24N/A
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.271 
  • R-Value Work: 0.229 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.229 
  • Space Group: P 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 41.961α = 72.29
b = 42.981β = 72.3
c = 71.545γ = 70.51
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
CNSrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
EPMRphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2006-06-06
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-05-01
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Source and taxonomy, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2017-10-18
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.4: 2019-09-04
    Changes: Data collection
  • Version 1.5: 2021-10-20
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.6: 2023-08-30
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description