2IVZ

Structure of TolB in complex with a peptide of the colicin E9 T- domain


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.222 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.170 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Competitive Recruitment of the Periplasmic Translocation Portal Tolb by a Natively Disordered Domain of Colicin E9

Loftus, S.R.Walker, D.Mate, M.J.Bonsor, D.A.James, R.Moore, G.R.Kleanthous, C.

(2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12353

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603433103
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2IVZ

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The natively disordered N-terminal 83-aa translocation (T) domain of E group nuclease colicins recruits OmpF to a colicin-receptor complex in the outer membrane (OM) as well as TolB in the periplasm of Escherichia coli, the latter triggering translocation of the toxin across the OM. We have identified the 16-residue TolB binding epitope in the natively disordered T-domain of the nuclease colicin E9 (ColE9) and solved the crystal structure of the complex. ColE9 folds into a distorted hairpin within a canyon of the six-bladed beta-propeller of TolB, using two tryptophans to bolt the toxin to the canyon floor and numerous intramolecular hydrogen bonds to stabilize the bound conformation. This mode of binding enables colicin side chains to hydrogen-bond TolB residues in and around the channel that runs through the beta-propeller and that constitutes the binding site of peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein (Pal). Pal is a globular binding partner of TolB, and their association is known to be important for OM integrity. The structure is therefore consistent with translocation models wherein the colicin disrupts the TolB-Pal complex causing local instability of the OM as a prelude to toxin import. Intriguingly, Ca(2+) ions, which bind within the beta-propeller channel and switch the surface electrostatics from negative to positive, are needed for the negatively charged T-domain to bind TolB with an affinity equivalent to that of Pal and competitively displace it. Our study demonstrates that natively disordered proteins can compete with globular proteins for binding to folded scaffolds but that this can require cofactors such as metal ions to offset unfavorable interactions.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biology (Area 10), University of York, York YO10 5YW, United Kingdom.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
PROTEIN TOLB
A, B, C, D
439Escherichia coliMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for P0A855 (Escherichia coli (strain K12))
Explore P0A855 
Go to UniProtKB:  P0A855
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP0A855
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence

Find similar proteins by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
COLICIN-E9
E, F, G, H
16Escherichia coliMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.1
UniProt
Find proteins for P09883 (Escherichia coli)
Explore P09883 
Go to UniProtKB:  P09883
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP09883
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.222 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.170 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 130.092α = 90
b = 39.933β = 110.62
c = 154.848γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
MOSFLMdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
MOLREPphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2006-08-16
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-05-08
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2023-12-13
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Other, Refinement description