SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
13D_15N-separated_NOESY10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O95% H2O/5% D2O1507.1AMBIENT298
23D_13C-separated_NOESY10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O95% H2O/5% D2O1507.1AMBIENT298
33D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O95% H2O/5% D2O1507.1AMBIENT298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT.STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1800 NOE CONSTRAINTS (338 INTRA, 465 SEQUENTIAL, 260 MEDIUM, AND 730 LONG RANGE) AND 130 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.Xplor-NIH
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementXplor-NIH2.9.3SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker
3processingNMRPipe2009Delagio,F. et al.
4data analysisXEASY1.3Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5data analysisGARANT2.1C. Bartels
6structural calculationCYANA2.1Guntert, P.
7refinementCYANA2.1Guntert, P.