2LE1

Solution NMR Structure of Tfu_2981 from Thermobifida fusca, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium Target TfR85A


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
22D 1H-13C CT-HSQC1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
33D HNCACB1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
43D CBCA(CO)NH1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
53D HNCO1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
63D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
73D HN(CA)CO1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
83D HCCH-TOCSY1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
9(4,3)D GFT HCCH-COSY-aliphatic1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
10(4,3)D GFT HCCH-COSY-aromatic1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
112D 1H-13C CT-HSQC aromatic1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
122D 1H-13C CT-HSQC methyl1.338 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
132D J-modulation 1H-15N HSQC1.338 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
142D J-modulation 1H-15N HSQC1.338 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 12.5 mg/mL Pf1 phage90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
152D J-modulation 1H-15N HSQC1.338 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 4 % PEG90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
162D 1H-15N LR-HSQC for Histidine1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
173D HBHA(CO)NH1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
182D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HDHE1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] TfR85A, 20 mM MES, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide90% H2O/10% D2O0.116.5ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE900
2BrukerAVANCE600
3VarianINOVA750
4VarianINOVA600
5VarianINOVA500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingStructure determination was performed by CYANA and AUTOSTRUCTURE in parallel using NOE-based constraints and PHI and PSI dihedral angle constraints. Consensus peak assignments generated from these parallel runs were selected and used for further refinement with CYANA, the RDC constraints were added at later stages. A total of 20 conformers out of 100 conformers with the lowest target function were selected for refinement with CNS using CNS water bath refinement.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriatarget function
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinemen,structure solution,geometry optimizationCNS1.2Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2refinement, geometry optimization, solution structureCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3data analysis,refinementAutoStructure2.1Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
4data analysis,chemical shift assignmentAutoAssign2.3.0Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
5processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6processingPROSA6.4Guntert
7collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
8processingTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
9structure analysisPSVSBhattacharya and Montelione
10geometry optimizationTALOS+Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
11geometry optimizationPALESPALES (Zweckstetter, Bax)
12data analysisCARA1.8.4Keller and Wuthrich
13refinementCNSBrunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read