SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O6.0328
22D 1H-1H TOCSY2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O6.0328
32D 1H-1H NOESY2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate90% H2O/10% D2O6.0328
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE500
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingTopSpin
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number200
Conformers Submitted Total Number10
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
2processingTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
3chemical shift assignmentSparky3.114Goddard
4data analysisSparky3.114Goddard
5geometry optimizationX-PLOR NIH2.24Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6structure solutionX-PLOR NIH2.24Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7data analysisPSVS1.3Bhattacharya and Montelione
8refinementX-PLOR NIH2.24Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore