2KQT

Solid-state NMR structure of the M2 transmembrane peptide of the influenza A virus in DMPC lipid bilayers bound to deuterated amantadine


SOLID-STATE NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 13C-13C Spin Diffusion5.8 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 21.6 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, .42 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
22D 13C-13C Spin Diffusion5.0 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 10.4 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.09 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
32D 13C-13C Spin Diffusion5.2 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 19.9 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.38 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
42D 13C-15N HETCOR5.8 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 21.6 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, .42 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
52D 13C-15N HETCOR5.0 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 10.4 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.09 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
62D 13C-15N HETCOR5.2 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 19.9 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.38 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
71D 2H-13C REDOR, single 13C pulse5.8 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 21.6 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, .42 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
81D 2H-13C REDOR, single 13C pulse5.0 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 10.4 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.09 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
91D 2H-13C REDOR, single 13C pulse5.2 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 19.9 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.38 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
101D 2H-13C REDOR, single 13C pulse5.8 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 21.6 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, .42 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
111D 2H-13C REDOR, single 2H pulse5.8 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 21.6 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, .42 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
121D 2H-13C REDOR, single 2H pulse5.0 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at S31, I32 and D44 M2-TM, 10.4 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.09 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
131D 2H-13C REDOR, single 2H pulse5.2 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 19.9 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.38 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
142H Static Quadrupolar Echo7 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 27 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 2.0 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
152H Static Quadrupolar Echo7 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 27 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.5 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
162H Static Quadrupolar Echo5.2 mg [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] at L26, V27, A29 and G34 M2-TM, 19.9 mg DMPC, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaN3, 0.38 mg [U-2H] d15-1-aminoadamantane*HCl10mM pH 7.5 phosphate buffer, 50% hydration7.5ambient243
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE400
2BrukerAVANCE600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealing, Monte CarloThe temperature was initially set to 1,000,000K and decreased by 10% every 100 steps until a temperature of 25 K was reached. The constants (CI-CIV) were obtained through a trial-and-error process. Some side chain rotamers were changed to maximize agreement with the radial distances., An ensemble of models was obtained by selecting the top scoring model after one round of Monte Carlo/Simulated Annealing minimization and refining again with the inverse kinematics algorithm. The distance potential constant CIII was set to 50 kcal/mol-radians^2. Since the radial distance provided excellent restraints between the drug and M2, we were able to position the amantidine molecule near with S31 without the need for further minimization. THE POSITION OF THE AMANTADINE LIGAND (PDB CODE 308) IS IDENTICAL IN ALL OF THE MINIMIZED STRUCTURE SINCE IT IS THE AVERAGE LIGAND POSITION RELATIVE TO THE BACKBONE. WE HAVE MEASURED A 13C-2H DIPOLAR COUPLING FROM SEVERAL PEPTIDE BACKBONE AND SIDECHAIN CARBONS TO THE DEUTERONS ON THE 308 LIGAND. WE SIMULATED THE THE RADIUS OF THE M2 CHANNEL PORE FOR THE SITES WHERE WE OBSERVED 13C-2H DIPOLAR COUPLING, AND FOUND PORE RADII FOR THESE SITES THAT CORRESPONDED WITH THE MEASURED 13C-2H DIPOLAR COUPLING AT THAT SITE. THUS, IN THE FINAL STRUCTURE MINIMIZATION, WE USED THE PORE RADII AS A CONSTRAINT RATHER THAN PEPTIDE-DRUG DISTANCES SINCE THE LIGAND IS ROTATING IN THE CHANNEL.TopSpin
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number24
Conformers Submitted Total Number17
Representative Model1 (fewest violations)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1collectionTopSpin1.3Bruker Biospin
2chemical shift assignmentTopSpin1.3Bruker Biospin
3processingTopSpin1.3Bruker Biospin
4data analysisTopSpin1.3Bruker Biospin
5peak pickingTopSpin1.3Bruker Biospin
6refinementX-PLOR_NIH, IN-HOUSE METHODSchwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7collectionXwinNMRBruker Biospin
8chemical shift assignmentXwinNMRBruker Biospin