1EKH
NMR STRUCTURE OF D(TTGGCCAA)2 BOUND TO CHROMOMYCIN-A3 AND COBALT
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | NOESY | D2O, 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 100mM NACL | 6.5 | 1 atm | 298 | ||
2 | COSY | D2O, 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 100mM NACL | 6.5 | 1 atm | 298 | ||
3 | TOCSY | D2O, 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 100mM NACL | 6.5 | 1 atm | 298 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | GE | OMEGA500 | 500 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
simulated annealing | Paramagnetic Shifts and NOEs used in refinement. Other REFINEMENT DETAILS CAN BE FOUND IN THE JRNL CITATION ABOVE | NMRPipe |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | MINIMIZED AVERAGED COORDINATES FROM 6 RUNS |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 6 |
Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
---|---|
Details | THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING PSEUDOCONTACT SHIFTS IN THE NMR SPECTRUM. PSEUDOCONTACT SHIFTS WERE MEASURED AS THE DIFFERENCE IN THE CHEMICAL SHIFT BETWEEN THE CO(II) COMPLEX AND THE ZN(II) COMPLEX. IN MODELS 1-3, ONLY SHIFTS WERE USED; IN MODELS 4-6 SHIFTS + NOE'S WERE USED IN REFINEMENT. |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | processing | NMRPipe | 1.7 | DeLaglio and Bax |
2 | data analysis | Sparky | 3.0 | Kneller and Goddard |
3 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.0, 3.851 | Brunger (modified by Gochin and Tu) |
4 | data analysis | Felix | 2.1 | Biosym |