1B60

3,N4-ETHENO-2'-DEOXYCYTIDINE OPPOSITE CYTIDINE IN AN 11-MER DUPLEX, SOLUTION STRUCTURE FROM NMR AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
1NOESY 6.8288
2COSY 6.8288
3DQF-COSY 6.8288
4COSY45 6.8288
5TOCSY 6.8288
6HETCORR 6.8288
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1VarianINOVA500
2VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONSREFINEMENT DETAILS CAN BE FOUND IN THE JRNL CITATION ABOVE.X-PLOR
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection CriteriaSEE DETAILS
Conformers Calculated Total Number1
Conformers Submitted Total Number1
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsSEE DETAILS. THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING 2D PROTON NMR FOLLOWED BY DISTANCE RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS, AND FURTHER REFINED USING THE FULL RELAXATION MATRIX BACK CALCULATION APPROACH. 15 STRUCTURES EACH WERE DETERMINED FROM A- AND B-FORM DNA BY USING DIFFERENT INITIAL TEMPERATURES AND DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF TIME AT THE HIGH TEMPERATURE STAGE OF THE 30 STRUCTURES FROM DISTANCE RESTRAINED DYNAMICS, 27 HAD AN RMSD TO THEIR AVERAGE OF LESS THAN 0.4 A, SO THE AVERAGE OF THESE 27 WAS USED AS THE STARTING STRUCTURE FOR FULL RELAXATION MATRIX BACK CALCULATIONS. THE MINIMIZED AVERAGE STRUCTURE FROM THIS LAST STEP IS WHAT HAS BEEN DEPOSITED.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementX-PLOR3.851BRUNGER
2structure solutionFelix
3structure solutionX-PLOR