SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents13C,15N-APOBEC3A, 93% H2O/7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)n/a
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D simultaneous 1H-13C and 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D simulaneous 1H-13C and 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCACB, 3D HN(COCA)CB, 3D simultaneous 1H-13C and 1H-15N NOESY, 3D HNCA, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D simultaneous 1H-13C and 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D HNCACB, 3D HN(COCA)CB, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D simulaneous 1H-13C and 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCA
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
Bruker Avance 700.0
Bruker Avance 900.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 512
Conformers Submitted Total Number 30
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, C.D. et al.