SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 20 mM MES, 200 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 10 mM DTT, 5 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 2D 1H-15N T2, 1D 15N T1, 1D 15N T2, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY_aliph, 3D 1H-13C NOESY_arom, 2D 1H-15N hetNOE, 2D 1H-15N T1
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] protein, 20 mM MES, 200 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 10 mM DTT, 5 uM DSS, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker AvanceIII 850.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
Bruker AvanceIII 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details CNS water refinement + RDCs
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 processing version: 2008 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
2 collection version: 6.1C VNMR Varian
3 collection version: 2.1.4 TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
4 refinement version: 1.3 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
5 data analysis version: 3.113 SPARKY Goddard
6 refinement version: 1.4 PSVS Bhattacharya and Montelione
7 structure solution version: 5.4 PDBSTAT (PdbStat)-Roberto Tejero and Gaetano T. Montelione
8 structure solution version: 3.0 CYANA__3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
9 refinement FMCGUI Alex Lemak, University of Toronto
10 refinement version: pales_linux PALES Zweckstetter