SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HYL1 dsRBD, 100 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.05 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCOCA JCAHA, 3D HNCO JCACO, 3D HNCO JCH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D HN(COCA)CB, 3D HN(CA)CO, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO JNH
Sample Contents0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HYL1 dsRBD, 100 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 0.05 % sodium azide, 5 % C12E5, 0.2 % Hexanol, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D HNCO JNH, 3D HNCOCA JCAHA, 3D HNCO JCACO, 3D HNCO JCH
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian Direct Drive 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method rosetta full atom relaxation
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 1000
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
2 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
3 data analysis NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 peak picking NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific