SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.89 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] DhR1A, 10 v/v [U-2H] D2O, 90 v/v H2O, 20 mM MES, 200 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 0.02 w/v sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength430
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCACB, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HCCH-COSY, 3D simultaneous NOESY
Sample Contents0.943 mM [U-5% 13C; U-99% 15N] DhR1A, 10 v/v [U-2H] D2O, 90 v/v H2O, 20 mM MES, 200 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM calcium chloride, 10 mM DTT, 50 uM DSS, 0.02 w/v sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength430
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITYPLUS 600.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection VNMRJ Varian
2 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 processing NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 chemical shift assignment XEASY Bartels et al.
5 data analysis XEASY Bartels et al.
6 peak picking XEASY Bartels et al.
7 processing SPSCAN Glaser
8 chemical shift assignment AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
9 structure solution CSI Wishart and Sykes
10 structure solution TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
11 structure solution CYANA Herrmann, Guntert and Wuthrich
12 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
13 data analysis Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
14 refinement Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
15 refinement PSVS Bhattacharya and Montelione