SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] mPar3 PDZ2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength54
pH7.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance II 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT
Details STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1307 NOE CONSTRAINTS (219 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 209 MEDIUM, AND 491 LONG RANGE) AND 117 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.1 TOPSPIN Bruker
2 processing version: 2007 nmrPipe Delagio,F. et al.
3 data analysis version: 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis version: 1.1.0 SPSCAN R.W. Glaser
5 data analysis version: 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation version: 2.1 Cyana Guntert, P.
7 refinement version: 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.