SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM CC3 hLtn, U-15N, 13C; 20 mM phospate buffer, 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength10 mM
pH6.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC)
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT.
Details STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1234 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 418 INTRA, 333 SEQUENTIAL, 153 MEDIUM and 330 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 82 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 ALL TRIPLE-RESONANCE AND NOESY SPECTRA WERE ACQUIRED USING A CRYOGENIC PROBE
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 3.5 XWINNMR --
2 processing version: 2004 NMRPipe Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G.W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., Bax, A.
3 data analysis version: 1.3 XEASY Bartels, C, Xia, T.-H., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis version: 2.1 GARANT Bartels, C., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
5 structure solution version: 2.1 CYANA Herrmann, T., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
6 refinement version: 2.9.3 XPLOR-NIH Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J, Tjandra, N., Clore, G.M.