SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents90% H2O/10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.02
pH6.7
Pressure1.0 ATM
Temperature (K)298.0
Experiment(s):CBCANH, CBCA(CO)NH, HN(CA)CO, HNCO, HBHA(CO)NH
Sample Contents90% H2O/10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.02
pH6.7
Pressure1.0 ATM
Temperature (K)298.0
Experiment(s):1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents90% H2O/10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.02
pH6.7
Pressure1.0 ATM
Temperature (K)298.0
Experiment(s):1H-13C HSQC, CC(CO)NH, H(CCO)NH, HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents90% H2O/10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.02
pH6.7
Pressure1.0 ATM
Temperature (K)298.0
Experiment(s):1H-15N NOESY, AROMATIC 13C HSQC, (HB)CB(CGCD)HD, (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE, 1H-13C NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER AVANCE 600.0
BRUKER AVANCE 600.0
BRUKER AVANCE 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details THE STRUCTURE WAS REFINED IN EXPLICIT WATER IN CNS. REFINEMENT DETAILS CAN BE FOUND IN THE JRNL CITATION ABOVE.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 n/a
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY ON 13C, 15N-LABELED FH10-11
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution CCPNMR ANALYSIS 2.2 n/a
2 structure solution CCPNMR ANALYSIS 2.1 n/a
3 structure solution CCPNMR ANALYSIS 2.0 n/a
4 structure solution AZARA 2.0 n/a
5 structure solution MOLMOL 2 n/a
6 structure solution TOPSPIN 1.3 n/a
7 structure solution PROCHECKNMR 3.4.3 n/a
8 structure solution CNS 1.2 n/a
9 refinement CNS 1.2 BRUNGER,ADAMS,CLORE,DELANO,GROS,GROSSE- KUNSTLEVE,JIANG,KUSZEWSKI,NILGES,PANNU,READ, RICE,SIMONSON,WARREN