SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2.0 mM 5'-D(*CP*GP*CP*GP*TP*TP*GP*TP*CP*C)-3'-1, 2.0 mM 5'-D(*GP*GP*AP*CP*TP*TP*CP*GP*CP*G)-3'-2, 4.0 mM Mercury(II) perchlorate-3, 100 mM Sodium perchlorate-4, 100 % [U-100% 2H] D2O-5, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.10
pH6.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY
Sample Contents2.0 mM 5'-D(*CP*GP*CP*GP*TP*TP*GP*TP*CP*C)-3'-6, 2.0 mM 5'-D(*GP*GP*AP*CP*TP*TP*CP*GP*CP*G)-3'-7, 4.0 mM Mercury(II) perchlorate-8, 100 mM Sodium perchlorate-9, 95 % H2O-10, 5 % [U-100% 2H] D2O-11, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength0.10
pH6.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER DRX800 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMMULATED ANNEALING
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 17
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution MARDIGRAS Thomas L. James
2 peak picking SPARKY 3.1 Goddard
3 chemical shift assignment SPARKY 3.1 Goddard
4 processing SPARKY 3.1 Goddard
5 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 n/a
6 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 n/a