SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM RNA (5'-P(GP*GP*CP*CP*GP*(PSU)P*AP*AP*CP*(PSU)P*AP*(PSU)P*AP*AP*CP*GP*GP*UP*C)-3'), 10 mM Potassium Phosphate, 50 mM Potassium Chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength70
pH7.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310.2
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C NATURAL ABUNDANCE HMQC, 2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY, 3D 1H-1H-1H TOCSY-NOESY, 2D 1H-31P HETCOR, 1D 31P
Sample Contents1.0 mM RNA (5'-P(GP*GP*CP*CP*GP*(PSU)P*AP*AP*CP*(PSU)P*AP*(PSU)P*AP*AP*CP*GP*GP*UP*C)-3'), 10 mM Potassium Phosphate, 50 mM Potassium Chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength70
pH7.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283.2
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 700.0
Varian Mercury 400.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria CONVERGED LOWEST ENERGY STRUCTURES
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
2 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
3 structure solution version: 1.2 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 refinement version: 1.2 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
5 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
6 processing TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin