SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.6 mM DNA/RNA (5'-R((CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(AF2)P*(AF2)D(P*(TAF)P*(UFT)P*(CFL)P*(GFZ)P*(CFL)P*(GFZ))-3'), 100 mM sodium chloride, 25 mM sodium phosphate, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength125
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents0.6 mM DNA/RNA (5'-R((CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(AF2)P*(AF2)D(P*(TAF)P*(UFT)P*(CFL)P*(GFZ)P*(CFL)P*(GFZ))-3'), 100 mM sodium chloride, 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength125
pH7.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
Bruker Avance 700.0
NMR Refinement
Method molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 20
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 geometry optimization AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
2 data analysis Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
3 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
4 refinement AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman