SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.6 mM DNA/RNA (5'-R((CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(AF2)P*(AF2)D(P*(TAF)P*(TAF)P*(CFL)P*(GFL)P*(CFL)P*(GFL))-3')-1, 100 mM sodium chloride-2, 25 mM sodium phosphate-3, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength125
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents0.6 mM DNA/RNA (5'-R((CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(CFZ)P*(GFZ)P*(AF2)P*(AF2)D(P*(TAF)P*(TAF)P*(CFL)P*(GFL)P*(CFL)P*(GFL))-3')-4, 100 mM sodium chloride-5, 25 mM sodium phosphate-6, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength125
pH7.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 700.0
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 20
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
2 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
3 data analysis Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
4 geometry optimization AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman