SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5 mM DNA(25-MER)-1, 10 mM potassium phosphate-2, 90 mM potassium chloride-3, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)273
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM DNA(25-MER)-1, 10 mM potassium phosphate-2, 90 mM potassium chloride-3, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM DNA(25-MER)-4, 10 mM potassium phosphate-5, 40 mM potassium chloride-6, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM DNA(25-MER)-7, 10 mM potassium phosphate-8, 90 mM potassium chloride-9, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian/Agilent VNMRS 800.0
Varian/Agilent VNMRS 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection VNMRJ Agilent Technologies
2 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
3 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
4 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5 data analysis AMBER 11 Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
6 refinement AMBER 11 Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
7 structure solution AMBER 11 Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman