SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data

Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] RRM domain of the hypothetical protein, 10 mM sodium acetate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength110
pH4.5
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):15N HSQC, HNCOCA, HNCACB, CBCACONH, 15N NOESY-HSQC, HNCO, HNCACO, HNCA
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] RRM domain of the hypothetical protein, 10 mM sodium acetate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength110
pH4.5
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):13C HSQC, aromatic 13C HSQC, 13C NOESY-HSQC, 13C aromatic NOESY-HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
Varian Inova 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulating annealing
Details Refinement in a box of water
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria 20 structures for lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 All 3D experiments were acquired with 30% non-uniform sampling using the MDDNMR approach
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR_NIH n/a
2 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH 2.32 Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3 data analysis ARIA 2.3 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4 data analysis CCPN_Analysis 2.2 CCPN
5 processing MDDNMR 2.2 (MDDNMR) Orekhov, Jaravine, Kazimierczuk
6 collection MDDNMR 2.2 (MDDNMR) Orekhov, Jaravine, Kazimierczuk
7 collection TOPSPIN 2.1 Bruker Biospin
8 collection VNMRJ 2.2D Varian
9 refinement CNS 1.21 Brunger A. T. et.al.