SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] RRM domain of the hypothetical protein, 10 mM sodium acetate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength110
pH4.5
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):15N HSQC, HNCOCA, HNCACB, CBCACONH, 15N NOESY-HSQC, HNCO, HNCACO, HNCA
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] RRM domain of the hypothetical protein, 10 mM sodium acetate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength110
pH4.5
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):13C HSQC, aromatic 13C HSQC, 13C NOESY-HSQC, 13C aromatic NOESY-HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulating annealing
Details Refinement in a box of water
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria 20 structures for lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 All 3D experiments were acquired with 30% non-uniform sampling using the MDDNMR approach
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement version: 1.21 CNS Brunger A. T. et.al.
2 collection version: 2.2D VNMRJ Varian
3 collection version: 2.1 TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
4 collection version: 2.2 MDDNMR (MDDNMR) Orekhov, Jaravine, Kazimierczuk
5 processing version: 2.2 MDDNMR (MDDNMR) Orekhov, Jaravine, Kazimierczuk
6 data analysis version: 2.2 CCPN_Analysis CCPN
7 data analysis version: 2.3 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
8 structure solution version: 2.32 X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
9 refinement X-PLOR_NIH --