SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents100-200 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] FCV VPg 7-76, 300 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength300
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HN(CA)CO, 3D HNCACB, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HBHA(CBCACO)NH, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents100-200 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] FCV VPg 7-76, 300 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM sodium azide, 20 mM HEPES, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength300
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic
Sample Contents100-200 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] FCV VPg 7-76, 300 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM sodium azide, 20 mM HEPES, 15 mg/mL Pf1 phage, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength300
pH7.0
PressureAmbient
Temperature (K)280
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 data analysis NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 chemical shift assignment MARS Zweckstetter et al., 2004
4 data analysis NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
6 structure solution ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
7 geometry optimization TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax