SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents590 uM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] MNV VPg 11-85, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM Sodium chloride, 1 mM DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength300
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D H(CC)(CO)NH, 3D (H)C(CCO)NH, 3D HBHA(CBCACO)NH, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D HNCACB, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HN(CA)CO
Sample Contents710 uM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] MNV VPg 11-85, 360 mM sodium chloride, 0.001 w/v sodium azide, 1 mM DTT, 60 mM sodium phosphate, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength360
pH6.5
PressureAmbient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD, 3D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D H(C)CH-TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment MARS Zweckstetter et al., 2004
2 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
3 data analysis NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 data analysis NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5 structure solution ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
6 geometry optimization TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
7 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read