SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.76 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CgR160.003, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 4D CC-NOESY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 2D 1H-15N HSQC-Histidine, 2D 1H-15N HSQC NH2 only, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HCCH-COSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D 1H-13C arom NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA
Sample Contents0.83 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] CgR160.0035, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
Bruker Avance 850.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 structure solution CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3 geometry optimization CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 refinement version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5 geometry optimization version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6 structure solution version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7 data analysis version: 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8 refinement version: 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9 data analysis version: 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10 chemical shift assignment version: 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
12 data analysis XEASY Bartels et al.
13 peak picking XEASY Bartels et al.
14 chemical shift assignment XEASY Bartels et al.
15 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
16 collection VNMRJ Varian
17 chemical shift assignment PINE Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
18 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
19 geometry optimization TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
20 structure validation PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione