SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents45 mM [U-2H] DPC, 5 w/v glycerol, 100 mM potassium phosphate, 0.001 mM DSS, 0.1-0.5 mM [U-13C; U-15N] Cytochrome b5 full-length, 0.1-0.5 mM heme, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY
Sample Contents45 mM [U-2H] DPC, 5 w/v glycerol, 100 mM potassium phosphate, 0.001 mM DSS, 0.1-0.5 mM [U-13C; U-15N; U-2H] Cytochrome b5 full-length, 0.1-0.5 mM heme, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB, 3D HN(CO)CA
Sample Contents45 mM [U-2H] DPC, 5 w/v glycerol, 100 mM potassium phosphate, 0.001 mM DSS, 0.1-0.5 mM Cytochrome b5 full-length, 0.1-0.5 mM heme, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 900.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, torsion angle dynamics, simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 23
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
2 refinement HADDOCK Alexandre Bonvin
3 peak picking SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
4 data analysis SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
5 chemical shift assignment SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
6 structure solution CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich