SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.2 mM [U-100% 15N] LFV-Z, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 200 mM sodium chloride, 3 mM sodium azide, 0.05 mM zinc sulfate, 0.05 mM TCEP, 7 % D2O, 93 % H2O, 93% H2O/7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength0.25
pH7.2
Pressure1
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents0.2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LFV-Z, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 200 mM sodium chloride, 3 mM sodium azide, 0.05 mM zinc sulfate, 0.05 mM TCEP, 7 % D2O, 93 % H2O, 93% H2O/7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength0.25
pH7.2
Pressure1
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D HBHA(CO)NH, 2D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD, 2D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE, 3D C(CO)NH-TOCSY, 3D HNCACB, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO
Sample Contents0.2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] LFV-Z, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 200 mM sodium chloride, 3 mM sodium azide, 0.05 mM zinc sulfate, 0.05 mM TCEP, 100 % D2O, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.25
pH7.2
Pressure1
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
3 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
4 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
5 processing NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax