SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.53 mM 5'-D(*CP*GP*CP*GP*AP*AP*TP*TP)[D3N]P-D(*GP*CP*GP)-3', 100 mM sodium chloride, 50 uM EDTA, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D 1H-1H COSY
Sample Contents0.53 mM 5'-D(*CP*GP*CP*GP*AP*AP*TP*TP)[D3N]P-D(*GP*CP*GP)-3', 10 mM sodium phosphate, 50 uM EDTA, 100 mM sodium chloride, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)278
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria back calculated data agree with experimental NOESY spectrum
Conformers Calculated Total Number 10
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift calculation SPARKY Goddard
2 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
3 processing MARDIGRAS Thomas L. James
4 data analysis CURVES 5.3 Ravishankar, G. et al.
5 data analysis CORMA Thomas L. James
6 processing TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
7 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
8 refinement AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman