SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.6 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CR10, 100 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM calcium chloride, 50 mM TRIS, 0.1 mM DSS, 0.1 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY aromatic, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D CBCA(CO)NH
Sample Contents0.6 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CR10, 50 mM calcium chloride, 100 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM TRIS, 0.1 mM DSS, 0.1 % sodium azide, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
Varian INOVA 750.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment version: 2.2 Analysis CCPN
2 peak picking version: 2.2 Analysis CCPN
3 structure solution ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4 refinement ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
5 processing NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax