SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents50 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength150
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNHA, IPAP-HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents50 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM TCEP, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength150
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D 1H-13C NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 21
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2 data analysis ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur
3 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
4 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
5 processing NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
8 chemical shift assignment CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich