SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.9 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-95% 2H; Ile,Leu,Val C1H3] BCL-xL, 0.9 mM PUMA BH3, 92% H2O/8% D2O
Solvent92% H2O/8% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298.1
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HN(CA)CO, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 14N edited, 2D 1H-1H NOESY 14N edited, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO
Sample Contents0.9 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] BCL-xL, 0.9 mM PUMA BH3, 92% H2O/8% D2O
Solvent92% H2O/8% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298.1
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle simulated annealing, molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement AMBER Case, Darden, Cheatham, III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollm
2 chemical shift assignment CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3 peak picking CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
4 structure solution CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5 chemical shift assignment CARA Keller and Wuthrich
6 peak picking CARA Keller and Wuthrich
7 data analysis CARA Keller and Wuthrich
8 processing TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
9 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin