SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.4 mM [U-95% 13C] MA, 0.8-1.0 mM 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine, sodium salt, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D 13C-edited/13C-filtered NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC
Sample Contents0.4-1.0 mM [U-95% 13C; U-95% 15N] MA, 0.8-1.0 mM 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine, sodium salt, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D HNCACB, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance II 700.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
2 data analysis CCPN_Analysis CCPN
3 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
5 structure solution CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich