SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-100% 15N] sC4, 0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] sC4, 0.8 mM [U-13C; U-15N; U-2H] sC4, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308.1
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] sC4, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308.1
Experiment(s):3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents0.8 mM sC4, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308.1
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 900.0
Bruker Avance 700.0
Bruker Avance 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 30
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2 structure solution Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
3 structure solution ProcheckNMR updated Laskowski and MacArthur
4 data analysis NMRDraw Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
5 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH updated Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6 chemical shift assignment NMRView updated Johnson, One Moon Scientific
7 processing NMRPipe updated Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax