SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM Get5, 2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Sgt2, 10 mM Bis-Tris, 50 mM L-arginine, 50 mM L-glutamic acid, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic
Sample Contents1 mM Get5, 2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Sgt2, 10 mM Bis-Tris, 50 mM L-arginine, 50 mM L-glutamic acid, 0.02 % sodium azide, 3.5 % polyacrylamide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Get5, 2 mM Sgt2, 10 mM Bis-Tris, 50 mM L-arginine, 50 mM L-glutamic acid, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Get5, 2 mM Sgt2, 10 mM Bis-Tris, 50 mM L-arginine, 50 mM L-glutamic acid, 0.02 % sodium azide, 3.5 % polyacrylamide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, experimentally driven docking
Details STRUCTURES OF ASYMMETRICALLY LABELED COMPLEX (SAMPLE_1 AND SAMPLE_3) WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE SEPERATE STRUCTURES OF GET5 OR SGT2, IN THEIR COMPLEX STATES. STRUCTURES ARE REFINED IN EXPLICIT WATER. AMBIGUOUS INTERACTION RESTRAINTS, RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLINGS AND INTERMOLECULAR NOES WERE USED TO DOCK THE STRUCTURES OF GET5 AND SGT2, DETERMINED IN THEIR COMPLEX STATES. STRUCTURES ARE SELECTED FROM THE BEST SCORING CLUSTER BY HADDOCK SCORES AND REFINED IN WATER.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis PALES Zweckstetter and Bax
2 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
3 structure solution HADDOCK 2.1 Alexandre Bonvin
4 refinement ARIA 2.3 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
5 structure solution ARIA 2.3 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
6 data analysis TALOS+ Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
7 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
8 chemical shift assignment Analysis CCPN
9 collection VNMRJ Varian