SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Sgt2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)297.5
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D C(CO)NH, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-COSY, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCO
Sample Contents2 mM [U-100% 15N] Sgt2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.02 % sodium azide, 7 % Polyacrylamide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)297.5
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents2 mM [U-100% 15N] Sgt2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0
pH6.1
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)297.5
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 800.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details REFINED IN EXPLICIT WATER
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
2 data analysis PALES Zweckstetter and Bax
3 refinement ARIA 2.3 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4 structure solution ARIA 2.3 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
5 data analysis TALOS+ Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
6 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7 chemical shift assignment Analysis CCPN
8 collection VNMRJ Varian